Tuesday, September 20, 2011

In the Heart of the Country

                The complexity of the J.M. Coetzee’s In the Heart of the Country is not only apparent through the characters that bind the story together, but also through the structure, language and elements of fiction and reality. When analyzing the structure of the novel, it is important to consider not only the way in which it is separated into numbered sections, the point of view of the narrator, but most importantly, the constant shifts in binary perspectives. These all contribute to Coetzee’s modernistic and  intricate literary approach.
                The novel is separated into 266 different sections, all of which detail a specific scene in Magda, the main character’s, life. As Derek Attridge explains in his article, the numbering of the sections indicate, “we are not to suspend disbelief as we read, that our encounter with human lives, thoughts and feelings is to take place against the background of a constant awareness of their mediation by language, generic and other conventions, and artistic decisions” (663). The reader must recognize the humanistic manner of the events that occur and place focus on the way they are introduced into the novel, moving from a set of events to a realistic literary narrative. Magda narrates the events in her life in a linear manner. Though we become aware of this linear structure and can highlights the chronological events that occur, it is without a doubt that there are missing gaps that are left unanswered. This brings the reader closer to the story, as the reader becomes a witness in Magda’s struggle to feel wanted and loved while simultaneously piecing together the puzzle pieces that formulate the “solitary spinster” she is described to be.
This brings us back to the narrative anomalies structured by the constant shift in the voice of Magda. The narrator, Magda shifts time after time from the first to the third person. The reader becomes entangled in a first person narrative−third person focalizer paradigm, one that provides dualistic points of view. The first person narrator allows for the narration of the events as they occur. The third person focalizer brings the reader into Magda’s consciousness and makes the reader aware of her thoughts and emotions as she narrates the story. On section 13, for instance, Magda states, “The Angel, that is how she is sometimes known, The Angel in black who comes to save the children of the brown folk from their coups and fevers…She needs to be needed. With no one to need her, she is baffled and bewildered” (Coetzee 5). Magna never really identifies herself as the “Dark Angel” she is speaking of, but little clues such as the idea that the “Angel” needs to be needed can clue the reader into assuming that she is speaking about herself. Also, the only other woman that has been presented at this point in the story is the woman Magda’s father brings home. Magda, however, does not know enough to identify this woman as an Angel. Though we are not told directly, we can assume that these are part of her unconscious thoughts and emotions that are circulating in Magda’s mind. The reader thus becomes a literary surgeon who must attempt to extract pieces of information from Magda’s  desolate mind.    

4 comments:

  1. Norma,
    I am just as fascinated by the complexity of the structural and language elements in this work, as you. And the complexity of the characters of course nicely complicates the story even more. Thus, we do not only become "literary surgeons who must attempt to extract pieces of information" from the main character's mind, we also become desperate explorers in the treacherous terrain of In the Heart of the Country. Magda represents everything the story is and does both in content and in structure. I found the comment about the linear nature of her narration of her life events interesting. See, I found it to be anything but linear. Where temporality is concerned, Magda's narration jumps from the "present" (if we even know when that present is) to the "past" and back to the present again. Add to that the clever mind-games that JMC constructs with this play between "fiction and reality", and the narration becomes not only non-linear, but also multidimensional as in "out of this world" at times. There were times I thought Magda's soul was narrating... I would be interested to hear more of your thoughts on the linearity of the narrative.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I as well did not find this book linear in her narration of her life. I believe that Magda is so far removed from what is real that perhaps she has invented another self so to speak. Coetzee has once again stepped into a characters mind and given a true glimpse of someone who has confused the present with the past and vice a versa. As Hudit points out that it is also "out of this world" that is very true, her acts of sending messages with stones is so far removed from reality it almost seems as if she is creating her own world that no one can permeate.
    I also wonder about the numbered sections and what significance the sections have on her sanity. Is it her way of organizing the details of her life? Is it maybe by days? Did it take 265 days to get to the end? Is this the only way she can put order to her life?
    Maybe the spaces between the numbered sections is what the reader does not know, the details that are missing that leave us the reader guessing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You have made many interesting points and have put a lot of thought into it. I do have to disagree with you on one thing. As others have said, I do not believe the story is told in a linear way. Near the very beginning Magna talks about killing her father in the beginning (although in a different manner) and then "jumps back" to him being alive. She also describes the arrival of a new bride and then it goes to her being alone again. Granted the groom changes from her father to Hendriks, but like Coetzee other novels I don't believe details are of that much importance. The point isn't explaining why each small change happens, but looking at the bigger picture and seeing how the story changes each time its told and what it says of story telling, narrators, and human nature. People don't think in a linear way. Our thoughts jump from the present to what we're going to do tomorrow, to what we did yesterday, and so forth. Our memories aren't aranged linear in our minds either. They are stored in our minds semi-jumbled up with basic organization as far as time and order goes. That's how I believe this story is told. Yes there technically is a linear story of Magda but its being told jumbled up to mirror the way her mind and memory works. Thanks for you incite and keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I was very interested in your comment tht Magda narrates in a very linear fashion. I actually felt that she was very circular in her explanation of events, particularly in the beginning between the entrance of her father and the new bride and then a few sections later the repetition of the event, but this time in terms of Hendrick and Anna. However, I think you make a good point that it is really up to the reader to determine what is truth and what is fiction, what is real and what is fantasized. Thank you for your post.

    ReplyDelete